Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

Nope, no jobs here

The Bureau of Labor Statistics has just delivered another not-at-all encouraging employment report, with payroll employment down another 263,000 for the month of September, the unemployment rate up to 9.8%, and U-6 unemployment (which includes what the BLS calls "discouraged workers" who have given up actively looking for jobs, plus "marginally attached workers" and a few other such categories) up to 17.0%.

It's the payroll employment numbers that are usually worth paying the most attention to, because they're from a survey with a far larger sample size than the unemployment data. The payroll decline was markedly worse than Bloomberg's consensus forecast of 175,000 jobs lost, although the consensus measure, as always, lagged what a lot of the more plugged-in forecasters had been saying over the past couple of days. The all-knowing team at Goldman Sachs, for example, raised their forecast yesterday rom 200,000 to 250,000 jobs lost.

The report also included small downward revisions to the July and August payroll numbers, plus a preliminary 824,000-job downward "benchmark revision" for the year. Put it all together and, since the start of the recession in December 2007, 7.2 million jobs have been lost. Oh, and hourly earnings were only barely up (0.1%) for September and hours worked were down 0.1%. As usual, health care was the only the only big sector reporting a gain in employment and construction continued to be the worst-hit sector.

All in all, it's not a report that really proves anything one way or the other—it's just a month's worth of preliminary data. But it definitely doesn't provide much in the way of encouragement. And the argument that we're in the middle of a recessionary W has probably just gained a few more adherents.

Update: Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics offers a teeny-weeny bit of encouragement:

The details are not quite as bad as the headline because the govt component fell a hefty 53K, so private payrolls were down 210K, not statistically different from Aug's -182K but better than previous months.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (6)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    I don't think a magic bullet is exactly what the American people are looking for. We'd just like to actually feel the effects of this recession being over as our government claims. I don't think we can actually go around claiming economic recovery while still expecting to have unemployment over 9% a year from now. I don't know, maybe I'm a little crazy but to me that's a country still looking for recovery.

    There's really no way to argue or skew those facts, the employment situation is dire. Eventually its just inevitable that we bottom out, but each and every month it seems like we think this is the bottom. That's the problem with bottoms, you can't tell if your there until your really on your way out. So I guess all we can do is cross our fingers and pray that this is really the bottom. Surely, things can't get worse, right?

    Check out my blog on the September unemployment report at ..... http://www.thedebtgazette.com/2009/10/september-job-losses/

  • 2

    [...] not-so-pretty employment report dissected.  (Calculated Risk, Curious Capitalist, Real Time Economics, EconomPic Data, Market Talk, [...]

  • 3

    [...] the original post here: BLS reports 263000 job losses, 9.8% unemployment rate for … Share and [...]

  • 4

    Most economists believe the recession is probably over, yet the unemployment rate keeps pushing higher, countering the expected trend. A plausibly more realistic estimate shows that it has gone beyond the double-digit instead of 9.8% as reported.

    Can someone be hiding something?

    Wouldn't it time for the Washington administration to focus more on this life-quality threatening issue and resolve it amiably in the shortest possible time rather than burning away more money and lives in the needless wars?
    (tan boon tee)

  • 5

    [...] A tax cut for hiring? Posted by Justin Fox Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 10:16 am Submit a Comment • Trackback (0) • Related Topics: jobs, recession, recovery, taxes Catherine Rampell has the story in today's NYT about the growing interest in the White House and elsewhere in Washington in a tax credit to entice businesses to hire. This was discussed as part of the stimulus legislation back at the beginning of the year but dropped. Now it's back because, while the economy seems to be growing a bit, the job market is still a total disaster. [...]

  • 6

    [...] job loss number of -190,000 has been revised down to 111,000. September's nasty -263,000, which had me wondering if the job market had started getting worse again, has been revised down to -139,000. So this [...]

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
VICKI ESCARRA, head of food-bank network Feeding America, which is logging record donations amid the recession; an estimated 1 in 6 Americans went without enough food at some point in 2008