Dutch finance minister Wouter Bos gives Tim Geithner some advice on bonuses
The Dutch have had their own bonus brouhaha over the past few weeks, with bailed-out bank ING coming under fire for paying out 300 million euros in bonuses for 2008. It resulted in the bank's chief executive asking his top 1,200 managers to give their bonuses back, and then a "gentleman's agreement" (herenakkoord) between Finance Minister Wouter Bos and the heads of 12 top financial institutions.
I heard an interview with Bos on my favorite Dutch radio show last week in which he said that he and Tim Geithner had gotten to talking about bonuses at the G-20 summit in London (the Netherlands isn't one of the G-20, but it and Spain were invited to the meeting anyway because they're just so nice to have around). Bos said Geithner seemed pretty interested in the gentleman's agreement, so he got his staff to translate it into English and send it to Geithner.
So what exactly did those Dutch gentlemen agree to? Could it be a model for the U.S.? Here are a few highlights, from the Dutch Finance Ministry website (translations mine):
* During the credit crisis, salary increases at the top of a company can't be any bigger than those for the rest of the personnel.
* At companies getting government support, the managing board [the top 5-10 executives, usually] won't get any variable pay [a.k.a. bonuses] for 2009.
* At government-supported companies, there should also be the greatest possible reticence regarding variable pay for other senior managers in 2009 and until a new compensation policy has been determined.
* As part of a more durable and moderate compensation policy, golden parachutes will not exceed one year's salary and long-term variable compensation will play a greater role relative to short-term variable pay.
Hmmm. Seems awfully gentleman's-agreementy. Which is probably a strength. Here, Congress passes laws that restrict compensation in more heavy-handed fashion, then Treasury looks for ways to get around them.
-
1
I am surprised that Obama allowed the legislation to go forward after reading this article.
-
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1889153,00.html
-
There are simply much better ways to change consumer behavior. -
2
All these points would seem like common sense lending/bailout practices to me, it's kind of amazing that it required talking to the Dutch for Geithner to take interest and figure that the populist sentiment of the times demands these things. But then again, the populist sentiment would probably be okay with mob style practices of bashing in knee caps of people throwing around money (bonuses) not paying it back, but I'm not sure if we can get away with that...yet.
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- NH Poll: Dems Face A Thumpin'
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- Jack Murtha, 77, Dies
- CO Gov Poll: Hickenlooper +4
- OH Gov Poll: Kasich Maintains Lead
- Paul Ryan Won't Run For Prez In 2012
- Google Looks To Crush Facebook, Twitter With a More Sociable Gmail
- White House Health Care Meeting Met With Skepticism On The Hill
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Al-Qaeda, Yemen, Wedding: Unlucky Name, Celebration
- Venezuela's Opposition Protests Slur Chavez at Ball Game
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa
- Foreign Fish Species Threaten Great Lakes Ecosystem
- 'Black Hearts': On Green, Iraq's 'Triangle of Death'
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- From Comcast to Xfinity: Does Name Change Conjure Porn?













RSS