New article: How to fix a broken financial system
My report on the day one TIME Board of Economists' session at Davos is in the new international edition(s) of TIME and online here. It begins:
Last year, the annual gathering of TIME's Board of Economists on the first day of the World Economic Forum in Davos was dominated by a debate over just how bad the then-gathering financial crisis would be, and whether the rest of the world would share in the economic comeuppance facing the U.S.
This Jan. 28, on a day when the lowering snow-filled skies matched the mood of those inside the Davos Congress Center, there was no such debate. In a packed room for what has become an opening-day tradition, everybody agreed with Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach's grim assessment that "this will most likely be the first year since the end of World War II when world GDP actually contracts." In fact, after Roach predicted 2.5% average global growth over the next three years — which still qualifies by most standards as a recession or close to it — Keio University economist and former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs Heizo Takenaka quipped that Roach was being "much more optimistic than expected."
Later on, Roach and Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf, who was in the audience, differed on whether we're in a "proto-depression" (Wolf) or a "global recession the likes of which we've never seen" (Roach). But that was more a linguistic debate than an economic one. There was also some disagreement over China's growth prospects. World Bank chief economist Justin Yifu Lin said he thought the country's big fiscal stimulus plans, including massive expenditure on infrastructure, would keep growth above 7% per year. No one else was that confident. Keep reading.
-
1
According to your colleague, there is no fix.
-
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1874702-3,00.html -
2
the key words in the article were "sustainable development" -- the economic theories that underpin the latest growth global growth spurt were based on tying growth in the third world to the centralization and exploitation of low-wage labor to benefit businesses and consumers in first world countries, and as we've seen the benefits of such an approach cannot be sustained (at least not when the US economy is based on laissez faire principles.) Indeed, not only can't it be sustained in terms of growth, in times of a global downturn the 3rd world countries that (at the developing world's urging) urbanized large chunks of their populations to become low wage assembly line workers will find themselves worse off -- where is the money going to be found to support these newly displaced workers?
_
the underlying flaw of the whole "globalization" theory is that its foundation is the welfare of multinational corporations, rather than the welfare of the people of the globe. "Starting over" is right -- and the first place to start is with strict regulation of multinational corporations, and a new emphasis on redistribution of wealth thoughout the globe.
_
Most Popular »
- State Dinner, Uh, Fashion
- Chutzpah
- UPDATE: Guess Who Came To Dinner?
- Two Game-Changing SF Novels I Read This Fall
- The Five Greatest Gadgets of All Time
- 1,000 Words: Gate-crasher Edition
- Gleeks and Shrieks: Fox Unveils Midseason, Glee Gone Until April
- The Five Most Underrated Sci-Fi Masterpieces
- Happy Thanksgiving From The AppleGeeks
- Fantastic Mr. Fox: Wes Anderson Talks Puppetry Perfection
- The 00's: A Decade from Hell
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Black Friday Sales Were Encouraging, Retailers Say
- Germany's Doubts About Afghanistan Grow After Revelations About Air Strike
- Why Big Shopping Bargains Are Bad News For America
- Will Dubai's Financial Problems Spread Around the Globe?
- Obama's First Year Policies Need Time to Settle In
- How to Get Smarter, One Breath at a Time













RSS