New article: How to fix a broken financial system
My report on the day one TIME Board of Economists' session at Davos is in the new international edition(s) of TIME and online here. It begins:
Last year, the annual gathering of TIME's Board of Economists on the first day of the World Economic Forum in Davos was dominated by a debate over just how bad the then-gathering financial crisis would be, and whether the rest of the world would share in the economic comeuppance facing the U.S.
This Jan. 28, on a day when the lowering snow-filled skies matched the mood of those inside the Davos Congress Center, there was no such debate. In a packed room for what has become an opening-day tradition, everybody agreed with Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach's grim assessment that "this will most likely be the first year since the end of World War II when world GDP actually contracts." In fact, after Roach predicted 2.5% average global growth over the next three years — which still qualifies by most standards as a recession or close to it — Keio University economist and former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs Heizo Takenaka quipped that Roach was being "much more optimistic than expected."
Later on, Roach and Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf, who was in the audience, differed on whether we're in a "proto-depression" (Wolf) or a "global recession the likes of which we've never seen" (Roach). But that was more a linguistic debate than an economic one. There was also some disagreement over China's growth prospects. World Bank chief economist Justin Yifu Lin said he thought the country's big fiscal stimulus plans, including massive expenditure on infrastructure, would keep growth above 7% per year. No one else was that confident. Keep reading.
-
1
According to your colleague, there is no fix.
-
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1874702-3,00.html -
2
the key words in the article were "sustainable development" -- the economic theories that underpin the latest growth global growth spurt were based on tying growth in the third world to the centralization and exploitation of low-wage labor to benefit businesses and consumers in first world countries, and as we've seen the benefits of such an approach cannot be sustained (at least not when the US economy is based on laissez faire principles.) Indeed, not only can't it be sustained in terms of growth, in times of a global downturn the 3rd world countries that (at the developing world's urging) urbanized large chunks of their populations to become low wage assembly line workers will find themselves worse off -- where is the money going to be found to support these newly displaced workers?
_
the underlying flaw of the whole "globalization" theory is that its foundation is the welfare of multinational corporations, rather than the welfare of the people of the globe. "Starting over" is right -- and the first place to start is with strict regulation of multinational corporations, and a new emphasis on redistribution of wealth thoughout the globe.
_
Most Popular »
- Tennessee Mayor Accuses Barack Obama Of Hating On Charlie Brown, Peanuts
- Wii Fit Plus Review
- NV Sen Poll: Reid In Trouble
- Obama Shifts Date of Copenhagen Visit
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- 'Forgotten Man' II: Two-Thirds of Jobless Blue-Collar
- 135 Money-Saving Resources and Tips, Special Holiday Season Edition
- False Economy: Think You're Saving Money? Think Again
- Twitter App Showdown: Echofon Pro vs Tweetie 2
- Loving The Joke
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Will Federal Spending Mistrust Mean the End of Obama's Audacity
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- Nicolas Sarkozy: A French Paradox
- Amanda Knox Testifies: The Murder Trial That Has Gripped Italy
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan
- Astronomers Spot Planet-Like Object GJ 758 B in Orbit
- Foxy Knoxy Case Still Roils Italy
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It













RSS