Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

When did Madoff go from legit to Ponzi?

One of the big questions that one hopes investigators will dig up an answer for over the next few weeks was when Bernie Madoff's investment strategy made the switch from legitimate to Ponzi scheme. It seems highly improbable that he meant for it to be a scam from the beginning. There just wasn't anything in it for him. He was already a pretty wealthy and successful brokerage-house chief. Why endanger that?

No, the progression probably went like this: At first Madoff's investment strategy—whatever the heck it was—actually did deliver smoothly positive returns. At some point those returns became less reliable, but Madoff opted to keep reporting them as smooth and use good months to make up for bad ones. (Hey, it worked for Jack Welch.) That went okay for a while, but then the market turned against him in a big way and, Nick Leeson-style, he doubled down in attempt to recoup the losses. That didn't work. But unlike Leeson, Madoff was the boss of the whole operation, so he could keep it going for a few more years as a Ponzi scheme.

When did this switch from return-smoothing to Ponzidom occur? I'm guessing it was sometime around 2001. That's when Madoff was the subject of a couple of skeptical articles, in the MAR/Hedge newsletter and in Barron's. He thus had extra incentive to prove those who questioned his unnaturally reliable performance wrong, at precisely the time when, as he told MAR/Hedge, his strategy was least likely to work. From MAR/Hedge:

[T]he split-strike conversion strategy is designed to work best in bull markets and, Madoff points out, until recently "we've really been in a bull market since '82, so this is a good period to do this kind of stuff."

That was in the spring of 2001, in the early stages of a bear market that would last almost two more years. After that, it's possible Madoff never again came close to having as much money in his accounts as he said he did, but kept fooling himself that he could somehow earn the money back. This year's bear market destroyed all hope of that.

It's a theory, anyway. Or at least a guess.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (7)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Going "legit" and going "ponzi" are two very relative terms on Wall Street.

  • 2

    Justin, maybe you'll interact with me on this. If you could extrapolate on your theory, please help me understand why he would move to the Ponzi scheme. Is it about his personal ego, his loss of wealth, or was just out to mislead.

    Perhaps people who work in the finacial industrial are just without any ethos...

  • 4

    The sad thing about this Ponzi scheme is this is probably not only indicative of the bankruptcy of several Wall Street firms in financial terms. It begs the question of whether some in the country's elite have gone completely morally bankrupt as well.

  • 5

    Justin, you should have asked Madoff to do his disappearing quarter trick. That's how you get him started!

  • 6

    You might want to consider another possibility. If he was really following the strategy that he claimed to be, his returns would rely less on the direction of the market, and more on the level of implied volatility. That would have made things tough during the "Great Moderation," 2003-2006. He got more money as time went along, so if he was following this strategy, the amount of excess rents relative to funds got smaller over time. Even with higher implied volatility 2007-2008, he was probably too far behind the eight ball to come back, and the panic of his shareholders, many of whom needed money, drew on the funds disproportionately, and it was over.

    All that said, I'm not sure it wasn't a pure fraud from the start; no one really knew what was going on except Madoff. Hopefully someone will get the full story from Madoff, and write it out for the rest of us.

  • 7

    MADOFF IS NOT SO UNIQUE - OVERSIGHT MAY NOT BE ENOUGH

    The corruption trench is deep and wide, much requires cleaning-up on Wall Street…
    --
    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-madoff-really-anomaly.html
    --

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
CORINNA LANKFORD, one of the 10 American Baptists who are detained in Haiti on child-trafficking charges