Is German (and Japanese and Chinese) frugality the problem?
Martin Wolf writes in today's FT:
What are Germany's characteristics? It has an overwhelmingly competitive manufacturing sector; it is a chronic surplus country, with structurally weak domestic demand (ameliorated briefly during unification); and it has managed to avoid any housing or domestic credit booms. Its elite appears indifferent to the country's rate of economic growth, even in the medium term; it is obsessed with the dangers of inflation; and it believes that countries that spend more than their incomes are somewhat immoral.
Germans claim, with reason, that their country is a pillar of rectitude. But it can be hard for ordinary countries to live with such rectitude. Of course, the rest of the eurozone has chosen this option. But countries with structural surpluses, such as Germany, compel their partners to run the deficits Germans despise.
There you have it. It's all the fault of those danged frugal Germans. Wolf's column is about how eurozone countries with big current account and/or fiscal deficits (Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain--but mainly Greece) are at some risk of defaulting on their debt if the recession drags on for too long. But it's also part of the broader point Wolf has been making lately: That without overly frugal countries like Germany and Japan and China, Americans (and Brits and Icelanders and Greeks and others) never would have been able to run up so much debt and get into so much financial trouble. Their saving compelled us to borrow. There's surely something to this, but I keep having trouble getting my mind around it. Should Squanderville really be blaming Thriftville?
-
1
This is a ludicrous idea. Lack of self restraint is a vice that cannot be blamed away.
-
2
Without the overseas savers, I could have MY savings in a nice safe government bond ladder ... earning good interest, right?
This might tie into our national obsession with equities. Savings in bonds is not usually "enough" for a safe retirement, so a cohort of boomers went into very high equity allocations.
I assume germans and japanese don't buy our stocks the way they buy our bonds.
-
3
(You really should talk to your page design crew about freeing up some whitespace for commentators' paragraph breaks. I hate being a second class citizen.)
-
4
Hey, Justin, I am a Chinese who read your column for a long time.
Just provide some insights why Chinese people save a lot.
China right now does not have a universal health care system for all people . If someone has cancer, he or she will have to pay the Medicare bill largely by themselves. Same thing in education, China government only provides compulsory education for 9 years, meaning that families need to pay full tuition for high school and college for their kids. Same thing in housing and other social welfares.
Saving is actually a deed showing lack of security. It is the root of frugality.
-
5
I don't think this is a problem unless Americans don't wish to conform to European standards. It is precisely what happens when you export jobs to a country where the cost of hiring a worker is cheaper. The corporations save more money, but they are putting less incentive back into their own local economy where the local workers have less disposable income unless they find other means of creating producing income. It is often said that foreign worker will now have the money to buy the host corporation country's goods, but at what price and do they make up for the fall in domestic demand. The countries mentioned above are huge producer nations which have relatively little consumption...especially China...or is it that they just have relatively little disposable income. The same might be said for Germany (I lived there for several years) where the tax rate is fairly high or Japan where the cost of living is one of the highest in the world. In conclusion, there is no place like Texas.
-
6
German, Chinese, and Japanese frugality is not the problem. But, China and Japan financed the borrowing spree long after it was clear it was unsustainable. Such lending was not frugality, but wild profligacy. Why? Because there is no sheriff that will obey the order to foreclose on American government assets should the US default.
The "frugal" can choose to try and continue to subsidize exports to the rest of the world, and thus export the pain, but it likely won't work, and thus growth must come from internal consumption.
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- NH Poll: Dems Face A Thumpin'
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- CO Gov Poll: Hickenlooper +4
- Paul Ryan Won't Run For Prez In 2012
- OH Gov Poll: Kasich Maintains Lead
- Jack Murtha, 77, Dies
- Google Looks To Crush Facebook, Twitter With a More Sociable Gmail
- White House Health Care Meeting Met With Skepticism On The Hill
- Foreign Fish Species Threaten Great Lakes Ecosystem
- Al-Qaeda, Yemen, Wedding: Unlucky Name, Celebration
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Venezuela: Chavez Protests at Ball Game Over Electricity
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- 'Black Hearts': On Green, Iraq's 'Triangle of Death'
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Fears Over Euro Zone Outlook
- Who Were The First Americans?













RSS