<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geithner gets Treasury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Fox</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12094</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12094</guid>
		<description>@dumdedumdum: All I&#039;m saying is that there&#039;s likely to be a division of labor with Treasury focusing on financial stuff (there&#039;s enough of that to worry about) and the White House economic team charged with putting together the Obama economic plan. That&#039;s the way it usually works, but there have been times--such as during the Rubin years, the Mellon years, and I guess the Paulson years--when Treasury dominated all economic policy.

@jayackroyd: Yeah, sometime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dumdedumdum: All I'm saying is that there's likely to be a division of labor with Treasury focusing on financial stuff (there's enough of that to worry about) and the White House economic team charged with putting together the Obama economic plan. That's the way it usually works, but there have been times--such as during the Rubin years, the Mellon years, and I guess the Paulson years--when Treasury dominated all economic policy.</p>
<p>@jayackroyd: Yeah, sometime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donthelibertariandemocrat</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12091</link>
		<dc:creator>donthelibertariandemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12091</guid>
		<description>My main problem was that he hired M.Alix, which seemed like failing up. However, I&#039;m about to read the speech you posted, and I read a post he did in June in the FT, which impressed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main problem was that he hired M.Alix, which seemed like failing up. However, I'm about to read the speech you posted, and I read a post he did in June in the FT, which impressed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayackroyd</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12090</link>
		<dc:creator>jayackroyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12090</guid>
		<description>Justin--
.
Citi commentary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin--<br />
.<br />
Citi commentary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumdedumdum</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12089</link>
		<dc:creator>dumdedumdum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12089</guid>
		<description>Justin, I am sometimes perplexed by comments that a particular cabinet nominee does not have specific types of experience.  Each of these departments (and Treasury in particular) have large competent career civil service staffs that know how to do things and are empowered to do most of them.  Geithner is probably a quick study and in this instance having someone take over at Treasury who is generally capable and well regarded but also has intimate familiarity with both the generalities and the specifics of the current mess is an ideal choice I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I am sometimes perplexed by comments that a particular cabinet nominee does not have specific types of experience.  Each of these departments (and Treasury in particular) have large competent career civil service staffs that know how to do things and are empowered to do most of them.  Geithner is probably a quick study and in this instance having someone take over at Treasury who is generally capable and well regarded but also has intimate familiarity with both the generalities and the specifics of the current mess is an ideal choice I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plukasiak</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12088</link>
		<dc:creator>plukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12088</guid>
		<description>while you probably have more than enough material for the paperback version appendices, the rise of the stock markets upon the release of the &#039;news&#039; that Geithner was going to be at treasury  strikes me as one more example of market non-rationality.  I mean, did they think that Obama was going to nominate Zippy the Pinhead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while you probably have more than enough material for the paperback version appendices, the rise of the stock markets upon the release of the 'news' that Geithner was going to be at treasury  strikes me as one more example of market non-rationality.  I mean, did they think that Obama was going to nominate Zippy the Pinhead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pneogy</title>
		<link>http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2008/11/21/geithner-gets-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-12086</link>
		<dc:creator>pneogy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/?p=3262#comment-12086</guid>
		<description>&quot;In a much-remarked upon speech in May 2007 he recited the usual Greenspan line about derivatives making the world less risky, then contemplated the possibility that while they perhaps reduced the risks of moderate financial shocks, they could make a significant financial crisis much, much worse.&quot;

Thank you, Mr. Geithner, for trying to warn us that hedging your bets the Hedge Fund way could lead to disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"In a much-remarked upon speech in May 2007 he recited the usual Greenspan line about derivatives making the world less risky, then contemplated the possibility that while they perhaps reduced the risks of moderate financial shocks, they could make a significant financial crisis much, much worse."</p>
<p>Thank you, Mr. Geithner, for trying to warn us that hedging your bets the Hedge Fund way could lead to disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
