Another bear (Jeremy Grantham) turns a little bit bullish
I quoted the warnings of veteran money manager Jeremy Grantham a couple of times in the lead-up to the current financial mess. My favorite came in July 2007 when Grantham described the minor jitters that had hit markets several times already that year:
Rather like a brontosaurus that has been bitten on the tail and most of the body hasn't noticed it yet, the signal is working its way up the vertebrae.
Anyway, Grantham's latest quarterly letter to investors is out (pdf!), and while most of it consists of a trenchant analysis of what went wrong, there's also this:
On October 10th we can say that, with the S&P at 900, stocks are cheap in the U.S. and cheaper still overseas. We will therefore be steady buyers at these prices. Not necessarily rapid buyers, in fact probably not, but steady buyers. But we have no illusions. Timing is difficult and is apparently not usually our skill set, although we got desperately and atypically lucky moving rapidly to underweight in emerging equities three months ago. That aside, we play the numbers. And we recognize the real possibilities of severe and typical overruns. We also recognize that the current crisis comes with possibly unique dangers of a global meltdown. We recognize, in short, that we are very probably buying too soon. Caveat emptor.
As Grantham points out elsewhere in the letter, he was also extremely bullish from 1973 to 1986--and it was only in the last four years of that 13-year stretch that the market turned bullish too.
-
1
is it accurate to call it "bullish" when he's not talking about the actual prospects for the economy, but rather whether stocks are a better choice for today's arbitraguers?
The problem with these kinds of analysists is that they aren't talking the same language as the average american, who wants to know where s/he can put his money and then forget about it, knowing it will both be safe, and provide a decent rate of return over the long haul.
Most americans don't have the time (let alone the expertise) to "play the market" successfully, yet the press seldom notes that the people they quote about "where I'm putting my money" are people who "play the market" for a living. The "news" that people want is whether they should change the way that the money in their IRAs and 401ks is distributed -- and Grantham isn't talking about that.
Most Popular »
- Chutzpah
- UPDATE: Guess Who Came To Dinner?
- Two Game-Changing SF Novels I Read This Fall
- State Dinner, Uh, Fashion
- The Five Greatest Gadgets of All Time
- 1,000 Words: Gate-crasher Edition
- Gleeks and Shrieks: Fox Unveils Midseason, Glee Gone Until April
- Happy Thanksgiving From The AppleGeeks
- The Five Most Underrated Sci-Fi Masterpieces
- Time to panic again! Or, on second thought ...
- The 00's: A Decade from Hell
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- Black Friday Sales Were Encouraging, Retailers Say
- Germany's Doubts About Afghanistan Grow After Revelations About Air Strike
- Why Big Shopping Bargains Are Bad News For America
- Will Dubai's Financial Problems Spread Around the Globe?
- How to Get Smarter, One Breath at a Time
- Obama's First Year Policies Need Time to Settle In













RSS