-
ADD TIME NEWS
- NEWSLETTERS
- Main
- Global Business
- Small Business
- Curious Capitalist
- Nerd World
- The Cheapskate Blog
- Money & Main Street
- Videos
Another bear (Jeremy Grantham) turns a little bit bullish
I quoted the warnings of veteran money manager Jeremy Grantham a couple of times in the lead-up to the current financial mess. My favorite came in July 2007 when Grantham described the minor jitters that had hit markets several times already that year:
Rather like a brontosaurus that has been bitten on the tail and most of the body hasn't noticed it yet, the signal is working its way up the vertebrae.
Anyway, Grantham's latest quarterly letter to investors is out (pdf!), and while most of it consists of a trenchant analysis of what went wrong, there's also this:
On October 10th we can say that, with the S&P at 900, stocks are cheap in the U.S. and cheaper still overseas. We will therefore be steady buyers at these prices. Not necessarily rapid buyers, in fact probably not, but steady buyers. But we have no illusions. Timing is difficult and is apparently not usually our skill set, although we got desperately and atypically lucky moving rapidly to underweight in emerging equities three months ago. That aside, we play the numbers. And we recognize the real possibilities of severe and typical overruns. We also recognize that the current crisis comes with possibly unique dangers of a global meltdown. We recognize, in short, that we are very probably buying too soon. Caveat emptor.
As Grantham points out elsewhere in the letter, he was also extremely bullish from 1973 to 1986--and it was only in the last four years of that 13-year stretch that the market turned bullish too.
-
is it accurate to call it "bullish" when he's not talking about the actual prospects for the economy, but rather whether stocks are a better choice for today's arbitraguers?
The problem with these kinds of analysists is that they aren't talking the same language as the average american, who wants to know where s/he can put his money and then forget about it, knowing it will both be safe, and provide a decent rate of return over the long haul.
Most americans don't have the time (let alone the expertise) to "play the market" successfully, yet the press seldom notes that the people they quote about "where I'm putting my money" are people who "play the market" for a living. The "news" that people want is whether they should change the way that the money in their IRAs and 401ks is distributed -- and Grantham isn't talking about that.
Most Popular »
- Embracing the Simple Life, Starting With Your Clothes
- Oh NO! He's CRASHING!
- Playing Good Cop/Bad Cop with Sotomayor?
- The (Positive, Enthusiastic, Subsidized) Critics of the Future?
- Cheney Slaps Back
- McCain: "Retract Immediately"
- The CIA: What Was It Up To?
- Palin In The Post
- Another Big, Unanswered Question About Events in Urumqi
- A Real American Hero
- The CIA's Secret Program: Why Wasn't Panetta Informed?
- Box-Office Weekend: BrÜno a One-Day Wonder?
- Harry Potter, Round 6: Darker, Richer and All Grown Up
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- Study: Help for Chronic Hair Pullers?
- Can Turmeric Relieve Pain? One Doctor's Opinion
- 7 Clues To Understanding Dick Cheney
- The Man Who Tamed the Tamil Tigers
- Housing Woes: Price Reductions Are Proliferating











RSS