The case for public ownership of the financial system
UK-based economist Willem Buiter, who earlier in the year was fiercely critical of the U.S. approach to managing the financial crisis, is okay with the AIG deal. But he wonders if it should be the beginning of something bigger:
If financial behemoths like AIG are too large and/or too interconnected to fail but not too smart to get themselves into situations where they need to be bailed out, then what is the case for letting private firms engage in such kinds of activities in the first place?
Is the reality of the modern, transactions-oriented model of financial capitalism indeed that large private firms make enormous private profits when the going is good and get bailed out and taken into temporary public ownership when the going gets bad, with the tax payer taking the risk and the losses?
If so, then why not keep these activities in permanent public ownership? There is a long-standing argument that there is no real case for private ownership of deposit-taking banking institutions, because these cannot exist safely without a deposit guarantee and/or lender of last resort facilities, that are ultimately underwritten by the taxpayer.
-
1
Hmmm. Does public ownership guarantee fiscal prudence and responsibility? Given the track record with Congress and various government and quasi-government organizations, I think not. And some portion of wealth is in fact created through financial innovation, although the herd mentality seems assured to end such innovation in disaster.
In any case, the problem doesn't appear to be with deposit-taking institutions right now, does it?
-
2
You're doin' a heck of a job, Willumstaddie!
I don't think the problem started with deposit-taking institutions, no. And they're generally not the ones getting hit by runs right now. But they're all vulnerable if asset values keep dropping.
-
3
wall street is on a borrowed time, as well as on a borrowed money. it won't last long. all the mccain friends will be bailed out one way or another, with the public money, before the election, and obama and the people will be stuck with unknown amount of bills, which our children and grandchildren will be paying off. they will be slaves to the thieves, who will be long gone beyond the legal reach, with their ill-gotten by then.
-
4
Public ownership of the financial system? I will settle for more public oversight of the financial system ..... and greater public ownership of the health care and educational systems.
-
5
More oversight by the Feds is needed. Its clear these unrestrained financial wizards are good at only paving their own pockets and could care less about whoever or whatever else gets in the way.
- TIME Why is Walmart suffering from a slump? | http://su.pr/2YFI39 - 12 minutes ago
- TIME Father H's story: Germany's pedophile priest scandal | http://su.pr/1faxLm - 25 minutes ago
- TIME See the pictures of the week | http://su.pr/1EBdzh - 2 hours ago
Most Popular »
- The Worst of Conservative Talk Radio
- "Alert the patriots: Tyrants are ruining our country!"
- Health Vote-o-Rama
- Right-Wing Nervous Breakdown
- KY Sen Poll: Paul Seizes Primary, General Leads
- Health Care Reform: Through The Looking Glass
- 2012 Poll: PPP (D) Finds Romney Leading In Close GOP Primary
- The Worst Live-Action Versions of Cartoon Classics
- Toy Story 3: New Toys Gallery
- 18 Android Apps To Get You Started
- Deep Funk: Why Britain is Feeling Bleak
- Getting Her Way: Pelosi's Powers of Persuasion
- Animal Suicide? OâBarry of Oscar Winner âCoveâ Says Yes
- In Thailand, A Little Black Magic Is Politics as Usual
- How Dems Got the Score They Wanted on Health Reform
- Catholic Europe: How Damaged is the Papacy?
- Cisco CRS-3 Router Speeds Streaming, Worries Film Execs
- 'Whip Smart': Melissa Febos on Her NYC Dominatrix Memoir
- Sochi: Russian Olympic Scandals, Short Funds, Strike
- Obama Jobs Bill, Economic Recovery: Creating Employment
Quotes of the Day »
RSS