The case for public ownership of the financial system
UK-based economist Willem Buiter, who earlier in the year was fiercely critical of the U.S. approach to managing the financial crisis, is okay with the AIG deal. But he wonders if it should be the beginning of something bigger:
If financial behemoths like AIG are too large and/or too interconnected to fail but not too smart to get themselves into situations where they need to be bailed out, then what is the case for letting private firms engage in such kinds of activities in the first place?
Is the reality of the modern, transactions-oriented model of financial capitalism indeed that large private firms make enormous private profits when the going is good and get bailed out and taken into temporary public ownership when the going gets bad, with the tax payer taking the risk and the losses?
If so, then why not keep these activities in permanent public ownership? There is a long-standing argument that there is no real case for private ownership of deposit-taking banking institutions, because these cannot exist safely without a deposit guarantee and/or lender of last resort facilities, that are ultimately underwritten by the taxpayer.
-
1
Hmmm. Does public ownership guarantee fiscal prudence and responsibility? Given the track record with Congress and various government and quasi-government organizations, I think not. And some portion of wealth is in fact created through financial innovation, although the herd mentality seems assured to end such innovation in disaster.
In any case, the problem doesn't appear to be with deposit-taking institutions right now, does it?
-
2
You're doin' a heck of a job, Willumstaddie!
I don't think the problem started with deposit-taking institutions, no. And they're generally not the ones getting hit by runs right now. But they're all vulnerable if asset values keep dropping.
-
3
wall street is on a borrowed time, as well as on a borrowed money. it won't last long. all the mccain friends will be bailed out one way or another, with the public money, before the election, and obama and the people will be stuck with unknown amount of bills, which our children and grandchildren will be paying off. they will be slaves to the thieves, who will be long gone beyond the legal reach, with their ill-gotten by then.
-
4
Public ownership of the financial system? I will settle for more public oversight of the financial system ..... and greater public ownership of the health care and educational systems.
-
5
More oversight by the Feds is needed. Its clear these unrestrained financial wizards are good at only paving their own pockets and could care less about whoever or whatever else gets in the way.
Most Popular »
- Idol Watch: The Final 12; or, Are You Kidding Me, America?
- The Worst Live-Action Versions of Cartoon Classics
- Pelosi Aborts Stupak Negotiations
- Lehman Examiner Finds Fraud, Probably
- CO Sen Poll: Bennet, Norton Tied At 43%
- CoCo Show a Go
- Can Obama Save the Day?
- Underplayed Story of the Day: Health Care Sticker Shock
- Q&A: Legend of the Seeker's Bridget Regan on Corsets, True Love & Being a Badass
- Poll: Would HC Reform Help or Hurt Party?
- Breast Pumping on Rise As Moms Choose Not to Breast-Feed
- The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- Call to Lift Ivory Sales Ban Threatens African Elephants
- Amnesty International: In the U.S., Too Many Women Dying While Having Babies
- Cell-Phone-Radiation Health Warnings Alarm, Spur Studies
- Holly Graf: Was Female Navy Captain Victim of Sexism?
- Pope's Brother in German Catholic Church Abuse Scandal
- Glenn Beck: Fox Host Channels American Fear, Anger
- Karl Rove Memoir 'Courage' Defends Bush Legacy, Iraq War
- PepsiCo Tests Fertilizer to Cut Tropicana CO2 Emissions













RSS