Take that, telemarketers
Like most run-of-the-mill consumers, I did a little jig this morning when I read that the FTC would be banning prerecorded sales calls. I don't care if advances in call-center telephony boost American productivity, picking up the receiver and being confronted with a prerecorded message is annoying.
Sure, there are exceptions, the same exceptions there are for the Do Not Call registry. Charities, political parties, people conducting surveys. Also, interestingly, banks, insurance companies and communications firms (like telephone companies), since they don't fall under the purview of the FTC.
But, in general, as the Wall Street Journal told me:
Beginning on Sept. 1, 2009, telemarketers can make recorded calls only to consumers who agree in writing to receive them.
And who in their right mind would write a letter to a telemarketer?
Well, as it turns out, when you take the time to read the regulation, you find out that companies can get your permission for prerecorded sales calls electronically. Here's the passage:
Because it always has been the Commission's intention to minimize any paperwork cost
or burden on businesses by permitting electronic signatures as evidence of compliance with the
amendment, the Commission has added an identical footnote to the proposed amendment so that
sellers can be assured that written agreements obtained in compliance with E-SIGN will satisfy the requirements of the amendment, such as, for example, agreements obtained via an email or
website form, telephone keypress, or voice recording.
The regulation does go on to say:
Any agreement obtained pursuant to E-SIGN must be sufficient to show that the consumer: (1) received clear and conspicuous disclosure of the consequences of providing the requested consent – i.e., that the consumer will receive future calls that deliver prerecorded messages – and (2) having received this information, agrees unambiguously to receive such calls at a telephone number the consumer designates.
But still: Web site form? You mean those things I routinely check the box for without reading at all?
I don't want to give the FTC too much grief over a consumer-friendly regulation that I'm sure the telemarketing industry is none-too-thrilled with. Still, it's not quite as jig-worthy as I first thought.
Barbara!
-
1
Productivity? It may be productive for the telemarketer, but it is anti-productive for the recipient. Especially those of us who work primarily from a home office. I bet the productivity claims do not include the *lost* productivity of the recipients.
-
2
I have to say that any law that hurts telemarketers is a good thing for all consumers. They are the lowest of the low, they are the cockroaches of the business world.
-
3
Telemarketers are more dinosaurs than cockroaches, given the prevalence today of caller ID and unidentified call blocking. They linger like newspapers, but are becoming less and less relevant as sources of revenue. I telemarketing call center just folded in my town. Perhaps that is jig-worthy.
-
4
You know, I've never understood the visceral reaction people have to telemarketers. I'm not saying it's not warranted—I just find it amazing how, as a society, we get angrier about telemarketing than we do pretty much anything else.
-
5
One way to fight back -waste there time put them on hold ask lots of questions put them on hold again stay in control of the conversation at least it's a fun way to take it out on them.
-
6
There is no law for Phelps, he can win at Oplympic game in Beijing, and win the heart of hot girls at Billionairecupid.com
-
7
You know, I've never understood the visceral reaction people have to telemarketers.
Because they force you to be rude and hang up on them. People in general don't like to be rude, so if you force them to be rude you've gotten them riled up. It doesn't matter how many times or ways you say no, they always have an answer. Yesterday I had a call like this.
"I'm selling X and would you like some?"
"No, we already have one and we're not interested at all"
"Actually, that's great if you aren't interested at all because..." And that's when I hung up. -
8
@JordanT: Yeah, that's interesting. It's not so much that they bother you, but rather that the way you wind up acting towards them bothers you. For the record, they annoy the crap out of me, too. I simply want to figure out why, since I know, intellectually, the person I'm being rude to is just some guy trying to make a living by working at a call center—not the company that's made the decision to call me at dinnertime.
Most Popular »
- Tennessee Mayor Accuses Barack Obama Of Hating On Charlie Brown, Peanuts
- Wii Fit Plus Review
- NV Sen Poll: Reid In Trouble
- Obama Shifts Date of Copenhagen Visit
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- 'Forgotten Man' II: Two-Thirds of Jobless Blue-Collar
- 135 Money-Saving Resources and Tips, Special Holiday Season Edition
- False Economy: Think You're Saving Money? Think Again
- Twitter App Showdown: Echofon Pro vs Tweetie 2
- Loving The Joke
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Will Federal Spending Mistrust Mean the End of Obama's Audacity
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- Nicolas Sarkozy: A French Paradox
- Amanda Knox Testifies: The Murder Trial That Has Gripped Italy
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan
- Astronomers Spot Planet-Like Object GJ 758 B in Orbit
- Foxy Knoxy Case Still Roils Italy
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It














RSS