How to react to the stock market beat down
I just had a delightful conversation with Gus Sauter, chief investment officer of Vanguard. You might expect the man who used to run the much-beloved investment shop's index funds to be dull as dirt, but quite the contrary. Did you know that he started a gold mine back in the early 80s?
As the market has gone a-plunging the past few days, Vanguard's seen an uptick in calls from investors wanting to know what to do. In a shocking turnabout, Vanguard has been advising people... to invest for the long-term. In fact, yesterday Vanguard posted a Q&A with Sauter on just that topic. An excerpt:
Disembodied questioner: How should investors respond?
Sauter: For many investors, the wisest response is no response at all.
When I asked Sauter that question, he mentioned the Q&A on the web site, and also made one other point. You can listen to what he had to say by clicking on this hyperlink.
I know, I know, this isn't sexy. Buy and hold. Ignore the market. Rebalance once—and only once—a year. The thing is, it also happens to be the best investment advice out there. And I'm not the only one who thinks so.
Barbara!
-
1
everything points to your "new austerity". while much has been written about the history of the amerucan psyche that allowed us to get into this mess, more is necessary to be written about what is perpetuating it.
the "i, me, mine" generations of overpaid, corporate executives (promoted by desperate reporting-quarter-at-a-time boards and greedy executive recruiters), overpaid entertainment stars (enabled by the box-office, the internet and bigger-than-life TV screens that reach millions of pitiful viewers), sports stars and owners (an artificial scarcity of teams and games created by sports commissioners and paid for by sports-crazed fans and advertisers), and a third-worldization immigration policy (via family-unification) of america's most vibrant states: new york, florida and california.
americans must come to realize that unless their half-century long habits undergo radical change, from consuming 70 percent of the gdp to 50 percent, then 40 percent, the rest of the world will not disengage from feeding and feeding off the ugly american.
-
2
Regarding Mackey's comment,"It's this principle that the purpose of business is not primarily to maximize the shareholder value."
I believe there are some who would argue the decline of the American auto industry started when maximizing shareholder value was put above designe and quality.Tony
Most Popular »
- Tennessee Mayor Accuses Barack Obama Of Hating On Charlie Brown, Peanuts
- Wii Fit Plus Review
- Obama Shifts Date of Copenhagen Visit
- NV Sen Poll: Reid In Trouble
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- 'Forgotten Man' II: Two-Thirds of Jobless Blue-Collar
- 135 Money-Saving Resources and Tips, Special Holiday Season Edition
- False Economy: Think You're Saving Money? Think Again
- Twitter App Showdown: Echofon Pro vs Tweetie 2
- Loving The Joke
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Will Federal Spending Mistrust Mean the End of Obama's Audacity
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- Nicolas Sarkozy: A French Paradox
- Amanda Knox Testifies: The Murder Trial That Has Gripped Italy
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan
- Astronomers Spot Planet-Like Object GJ 758 B in Orbit
- Foxy Knoxy Case Still Roils Italy
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It













RSS