Merrill's David Rosenberg goes postal on the inflation conspiracy theorists
It is very fashionable these days to declare that the Consumer Price Index is wildly understating actual inflation. I'm dubious, and my dubiousness may eventually lead to some actual reporting and maybe a column, but for the moment I rely on the judgments of people named David. First there was David Leonhardt a couple weeks ago in the NYT, and now Merrill Lynch North American economist David Rosenberg weighs in a report to clients that begins:
It's truly fascinating ... that the pundits choose now to come out and inform everyone how distorted the CPI is. This is new? Nobody knew that today's CPI is structured differently than it was three decades ago? ... Everybody is judging the inflation landscape strictly on what is happening in the commodity markets, yet when the CRB was sagging at between 15% and 20% annual rates with near consistency in 1998 and 1999, and the headline inflation rate was locked in a 1.5% to 2.5% band, nobody questioned why it was back then that the CPI wasn't deflating along with the commodity complex.
Later in the piece Rosenberg runs through a bunch of things that are declining in price (toys, furniture, appliances, new vehicles, tools, clothing), and he declares that while some Americans might be feeling more pain that the 3.88% headline inflation rate would indicate, many others are feeling less:
If, say, you are a homeowner with young kids but no pets; you take public transit as opposed to driving a car; don't fly; don't drink, don't smoke; you prefer to eat in rather than eating out; your inflation rate is likely less than 2% right now.
I drink and I fly--although my employer pays for it much of the time (the flying, that is; not so much the drinking) and we have pets (but just a fish and a guinea pig), but otherwise that describes me to a tee. No wonder I'm dubious when people say inflation is skyrocketing.
-
1
Well, when someone rails about the claim "that the Consumer Price Index is wildly understating actual inflation" ... I wonder if they are avoiding the more moderate forms of the question.
Bill Gross puts out "1%" right? That's not wild, but enough to give anyone with bond investments serious pause.
-
2
Agreed. And if I get around to doing some actual reporting on this I will make the effort to differentiate between the Bill Grosses of the world and the Kevin Phillipses.
-
3
Thanks. I can certainly understand how inflation measurement could get wonky over the decades (the political pushback against high estimates is *huge* and well documented), but I just don't think it's so. Kevin Phillips is wacko on this point.
i.e., imputed rent. It seems like about as good a way as any to measure that difficult-to-valuate aspect of national living costs. While plummeting house prices hurt, and hurt badly, there's no denying the fact that long-term, they result in lower housing costs.
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- NBC: There Was Never a Conan O'Brien
- NH Poll: Dems Face A Thumpin'
- Paul Ryan Won't Run For Prez In 2012
- Barack Obama: Then vs. Now
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- Gibbs Mocks Palin, Tea Party Convention
- CO Gov Poll: Hickenlooper +4
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- In The Spotlight, Paul Ryan Faces A Purity Test
- Asian Carp Battle: Foreign Fish Threaten Great Lakes
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Fears Over Euro Zone Outlook
- Kennewick Man, Archaeology Find: Who Discovered America?
- Al-Qaeda, Yemen, Wedding: Unlucky Name, Celebration
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Venezuela: Chavez Protests at Ball Game Over Electricity
- Jim Frederick, Black Hearts in Iraq's Triangle of Death
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa













RSS