Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

Wrigley and Mars and Buffett: Sweet!

BerkMarsWrig.JPG

Let's be honest. A lot of corporate mergers don't make sense. But chocolate-maker Mars buying gum-maker Wrigley with all-around-smart-guy Warren Buffett helping to finance the deal? Do I get M&Ms thrown at me if I call that delicious?

On this morning's conference call, there was a lot talk about the "strong cultural and strategic fit" between Wrigley, a company whose chairman is the great-grandson of its founder, and Mars, another old family firm, one that remains in the closely guarded hands of Forrest Mars Sr.'s heirs. Under the Mars umbrella, Wrigley will get to keep running as a stand-alone company—importantly, still based in Chicago—and will pick up Mars's non-chocolate sugar brands, including Starburst and Skittles. Mars, a privately held company whose sales of $22 billion far eclipse Wrigley's $5.4 billion, will get a partner that makes it practically impenetrable at grocery and convenience-store check-outs (that's a really profitable place to be, BTW), and even more of a force in growing candy markets overseas.

All that is worth $80 a share in cash to Mars—a 28% premium to Friday's close. That values Wrigley at about 4.12 times 2007 revenues, according to a little math done this morning by Citigroup analyst David Driscoll. Not too shabby for Wrigley considering similar deals have recently gone for 2.5 to 3.0 times trailing 12 month sales.

And what does Buffett get for his $4.4 billion of debt financing and eventual equity stake (of at least 10%) in the Wrigley subsidiary? A company he has ogled for years. Wrigley is right up his alley. In his words, it's a "business that's easy to understand, with favorable long-term economics, and able and trustworthy management." Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway already owns See's Candies, which he gushed about in his annual letter to shareholders this year. Add in Mars's deep pockets and history of investing in its brands for the long-term—ah, private ownership—and who isn't a winner?

Oh, yeah, Hershey. Really, really should have had a V8 on this one. Wrigley tried to buy you in 2002, silly! More recently, Cadbury has apparently come a courtin', but, it seems, been rebuffed by the Hershey Trust, which controls 78% of Hershey's votes and doesn't want to lose its control. Maybe now Cadbury will make another go of it? Reuters thinks so. It's candy consolidation time, folks.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (3)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    As a Non chocoholic I find it it more difficult to understand the huge hype about chocolate products. I have to say that my wife does! which puts me in a tiny minority around the world.

    I have more of an afinity for chewing gum and this article at least spurred me on to read up a little history about wrigley.

    Does anyone in the chocoholic brigade know if chocolate varies around the world or even from state to state? The reason I ask this is that Coca cola's museum in Atlanta openly describes the 70 different flavours of Coca Cola around the world.

    Is there a standard chocolate taste, or does Mars have to blend it differently everywhere? If so, then Mars and wrigley deserve their unique position in the market place.

  • 2

    Kit Kats taste different in UK than here (they are better in UK)

    Cadbury's distributed in the US is actually made by Hershey's under one of the stupidest perpetual rights contracts ever signed by Cadburys. It tastes disgusting compared to the real thing. Hershey's should be obliterated for this offense.

  • 3

    Kit Kats taste different in UK than here (they are better in UK)

    Cadbury's distributed in the US is actually made by Hershey's under one of the stupidest perpetual rights contracts ever signed by Cadburys. It tastes disgusting compared to the real thing. Hershey's should be obliterated for this offense.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed