Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

Immigration is not as big an issue for voters as some people thought

I've been busy writing my column, and I figure this blog really isn't the place anybody turns to for election analysis. But one thing struck me about last night's Republican results that is of some economic interest: Immigration wasn't anywhere close to being a decisive issue. If it were, Romney would have done a lot better in California.

It wasn't irrelevant. Romney did run stronger in counties where illegal immigration is a big issue. The only big county in the state that he won was Fresno County, a huge magnet for immigrants. And he came pretty close in San Diego County, right there on the border with Mexico, and in Orange County just north of it. But on the whole, immigration softie John McCain beat immigration hardliner Romney pretty decisively among Republican voters in Southern California.

This indicates to me that immigration is one of those issues that 5% or 10% of the population truly sees as priority No. 1, while the rest of us--whatever we tell the pollsters--care a lot more about other stuff. Which means there will always be a loud, scary uproar whenever any kind of amnesty bill is proposed in Congress, but probably no majority for any kind of serious crackdown. Which means it's quite possible that, eight years from now, our immigration laws will be about the same as what we've got now.

Either that, or California Republicans just didn't believe Romney's immigration-hardliner schtick. In which case I don't know what the election results mean.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (1)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Illegal Aliens:

    Missing from the media and candidates poly-talk are the numerous legal avenues to enter the United States as a true immigrant or temporary worker.
    Not everything is as complicated as a green card (permanent residence), why are programs like H2A (unskilled agriculture) or H2B (general labor) never discuss?
    The fact is, that it is not hard for a foreign worker to legally get a job in this country. It's a misconception (on both sides of the border) that swimming the Rio Grand is the only way to get a job in the USA.

    I have seen statistics (read Mark Twain) that every illegal laborer cost the tax payer around $32,000 per year. That may be way off, it may be close, but benefits are afforded illegal aliens and their dependents, and it is undoubtedly paid by the tax payer. “the silent subsidy” (wasn't it LBJ that coined “silent majority”?).

    Immigrant is another misconception. It's a blanket term used to describe the illegal workers and residents alike. The truth is that only about one half of illegal border hoppers plan to stay in America. That's right, 10 or more million illegal Mexican workers plan to remain Mexican citizens. They save every dime they can, send their wages home, and plan to go to the country they call home when their nest egg is sufficient. (Did it every cross anybodies mind why so few immigrants bother to learn English? They won't be using it for long.)

    This in capitalism is referred to as arbitrage. In simpler terms it is transferring the wealth from one economy (market) to another.

    I believe it's time the true issues get brought to the front. Poor information has been abundant for as long as the, illegal alien, migrant worker, immigrant, (what ever is PC?) has been a topic.

    These are:
    · Why are workers illegally crossing the border when there are so many ways to legally enter the USA?
    · How much is ignoring US law costing the tax payer?
    · How much wealth is being removed from the US economy?

    It would be immeasurably easier to talk of amnesty if the people who want to become US Citizens were counted separate from those that want to make a buck and go home.

    Is everybody is afraid to admit that a great portion of illegal immigrants are willfully breaking the law today, and plan to continue breaking the law until they're stopped? Who dare point a finger at those who break the law and call them criminal?

    Are we, as a country, laying the foundation for law being enforced based on how popular it is with those affected?

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed