Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

New column: The rites of recession

I have a column in the magazine with "The Science of Romance" on the cover (in the U.S., overseas it's Ny lon kong--which, somewhat disappointedly, is not the amazing tale of a giant pantyhosed gorilla) and online here. The column begins:

Every day it's looking more like a recession in the U.S. The December economic numbers (released in January) have been mostly bad: unemployment up, to 5%; retail sales down 0.4%; industrial production flat. The housing market, where all the trouble started, is still in the tank. Banks are reporting big new losses and layoffs. Stock prices are plummeting. Presidential contenders are starting to focus on the economy on the campaign trail. It's ugly out there.

So let's just say it is in fact recession time for the world's biggest economy. What does that mean, exactly?

To be pedantic about it, that means a "significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months." That's the semiofficial definition of a recession, courtesy of the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private think tank that since 1929 has determined the start and end dates of U.S. downturns. A clearer but clunkier standard is two straight quarters of declining gross domestic product. Or there's Harry Truman's classic definition: "It's a recession when your neighbor loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours."

What we're talking about is an economy-wide mood swing. Businesses in lots of industries shed jobs. Consumers tighten their belts. Banks curtail lending. And then, usually within 12 months, things bottom out and start heading upward again. It's a temporary, cyclical phenomenon--not to be confused with long-term trends like the rise of China and India, the growth in income inequality and the decline of the TV sitcom. Read more.

So much has happened in the two days since I finished writing the column that it seems a little strange to look back at it now. Actually, scratch that. Nothing significant has happened in the past two days; it's just that a lot has been said about stimulating the poor old ailing economy.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (3)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    overseas it's Ny lon kong--which, somewhat disappointedly, is not the amazing tale of a giant pantyhosed gorilla)

    did you come up with that yourself, or were you just the first one in the office to blog it?

    oh, and what do you mean by "layoffs" at banks. Are the idiots responsible for this mess getting canned with nice "separation" packages, or are tellers, clerks, etc taking it on the chin?

  • 2

    I actually did come up with it all by myself, but would not be surprised if others did so independently.

    Citi's been talking about thousands and thousands of layoffs, so that's gotta go pretty far down in the ranks. But some previously pretty highly compensated people in the mortgage securities area at Citi and elsewhere are getting canned too.

  • 3

    i heard a comment on the news, implying that even George Bushes multi-billion dollar cash injection wont stop it now.
    Franchise Business Opporunity Email Marketing Software

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
ROBB LEVIN, resident of Fairfax, Virginia, on the $15,000 lawsuit settlement made against Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the White House gate crashers, who are also involved in at least 15 other civil suits

Stay Connected with TIME.com