Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

The railroads and their freight customers go to battle

There's a major business battle brewing in Congress that's been getting hardly any mainstream press coverage (well, here's something, but it took me a while to find it). On one side are the nation's four big railroads, which have been operating at close to capacity and making a lot of money lately. On the other side are their big customers, who think they're paying way too much to get their freight moved around.

I learned this because Jack Gerard, CEO of the American Chemistry Council, stopped by today. He's a big player in Consumers United for Rail Equity (CURE), which is lobbying to strip the railroad industry of its exemption from antitrust laws and toughen up the Surface Transportation Board, which regulates railroads. Bills to do just that are making their way through the Senate and House. Also, a recent CURE study (pdf!) claims railroads have overcharged customers with $6.4 billion in bogus fuel surcharges.

Meanwhile, the railroads are trying to get a tax credit to help them expand capacity. Gerard says the customers want more rail capacity too, but won't lobby for it until they get their own bill passed. "Needless to say, it's become quite a tense relationship between the railroads and their shippers," he says.

I have no idea which side is in the right here. But I'm all for well-funded business groups doing battle with each other, because they're great sources of information that might never come to light otherwise.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (2)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    The basic problem of shippers and their railroads is service and rates. About 125 years ago shippers were complaining that railraods were setting rates to high so we tried to fix this by establishing the Interstate Commerce Comission. The ICC established fair rates for shippers that were compensatory to the railroads, or at least that was what it was supposed to do.

    The ICC failed.

    The ICC almost totally stifled productivity improvments. Railroads which tried to impliment better service and lower rates were told they could not do so. The ICC procedures and rules caused some traffic to shift to truck and away from rail. We are still bearing the crowded highway costs of that legacy. When the ICC was finally abolished, average rail rates declined and service generally improved.

    We should pay attention to how much our past experiments with economic regulation of airlines and railroads has cost us. My calculations indicate the ICC cost the American public about $250 billion in higher rates and lower productivity because of the rules and regulations the ICC set up and enforced. A good example of this can be seen in the vestigial element of airline pricing called "Y class" fares. Ask any airline agent (if you can talk to a live person) what a Y class fares would be in comparison to what you are asked to pay. You will often find that Southwest or Airtran or Jet Blue are charging even lower rates than that. Those differences between the regulated fare (now known as the Y class fare) and the market fare show the economic costs of regulations. The same type of difference can be found in rail rates.

    Railroads do not need any different treatment or different tax than any other business. We as a public should not give them a preferred treatment. And we should certainly not try to regulate their economics.

  • 2

    Justin
    You mention "four big railroads", and I know that you know there are hundreds of smaller ones. But in fact there are six big railroads in the United States:
    Burlington Northern Santa Fe
    Union Pacific
    CSX
    Norfolk Southern
    Canadian National
    Canadian Pacific
    The last two are transcontinental and have extensive trackage in the United States. Canadian National is the only railroad in the United States that directly serves Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf coast cities.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed