The real estate bust in all its many colors, second installment
The new Case-Shiller house price numbers are out today, and as you've probably already heard, they're ugly. But they can be made pretty, and I got so much attention from other blogs the last time Time.com graphics czar Feilding Cage and I did this chart that I figured I had to post the updated version. Here it is:

Case-Shiller has numbers for most its metro areas back to 1991 and in some cases 1987. And while for the current downturn it's really the post-2000 numbers that matter, I am curious what the longer-term chart looks like. So I'm going to work on that.
-
1
I'm thankful to see the housing bust. Maybe it will put an end to the destruction of perfectly good homes in my neighborhood, which are being torn down to make way for big-footpring McMansions that have hardly any lot left after construction. They are cheaply built and overpriced, and represent a colosal misallocation of capital. Why should low-wage asians be saving in order to support this wasteful, profligate use of capital by us Americans?
-
2
Ted Harwood is correct. Those huge new houses are cheaply built and overpriced. Many of those homes will be falling apart within 10 years. They were made by shady construction companies with underskilled workers and low quality materials. Houses were made with no more care than a house made with cards, popsicle sticks, or Legos.
Many of the inspectors were either paid off or were overworked from inspecting so many properties. This resulted in the small but essential things of a house getting overlooked. I suspect that many of these newer houses will have foundation and structural problems that will result in the destruction of the house all together.
The boom was just one big pyramid scheme.
-
3
Over inflated house prices were result of over exaggerated demand not a need - people think they will make money via buy-to-let and then sell.. but unfortunately everybody thinks in the same way and result - we have insolvency hitting the Everest.
-
4
I think future economists will look at your data set and the data set that will be evolving over the next several years and proclaim that the Fed kept interest rates too low Even now. Granted had we had interest rates one to 1.5 percent higher during the last six years, we would have had less joy in the markets and in home construction, but there would have been a lot less blood being spilled. But it is very hard to wean people from free or low cost money. And because politicians love low cost money (even the Republicans have caught the Deomcratic populist disease) we still have it.
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- Jack Murtha, 77, Dies
- White House Health Care Meeting Met With Skepticism On The Hill
- Google Looks To Crush Facebook, Twitter With a More Sociable Gmail
- Oscar Overload: The Avatar-District 9 Brawl Begins
- Batman 3: It Won't Be Long Now
- Rep. Murtha Dies
- Best and Worst Super Bowl Ads 2010: The Good, the Bad and the (Misogynistically) Ugly
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Al-Qaeda Wedding: Celebrating in an Unfortunately Named Town
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa
- Venezuela's Opposition Protests Slur Chavez at Ball Game
- 'Black Hearts': On Green, Iraq's 'Triangle of Death'
- Foreign Fish Species Threaten Great Lakes Ecosystem
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- From Comcast to Xfinity: Does Name Change Conjure Porn?













RSS