Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

Thinking more subversive thoughts about whether capital gains really deserve a tax break

A few weeks ago, The Epicurean Dealmaker declared that:

If any of you PE knuckleheads piss off Congress so much with your lame and pathetic special pleading that they decide to eliminate capital gains tax treatment altogether, you'd better find a deep, dark hole to run and hide in.

I don't know about Congress, but I do know that this private equity tax battle is causing a lot of people who are generally well-disposed to capitalism to wonder if it really is so smart to tax capital gains at a lower rate than the income people actually, y'know, earn. Here's Felix Salmon:

The way I see it, when you're rich enough, you can pretty much always structure your income so that it turns into a capital gain. (In its simplest form, you just found a company with a little bit of money, redirect your income into that company, and then sell the company.) So having a capital gains tax rate much lower than the income tax rate is tantamount to giving the rich a massive tax break – even before accounting for the fact that it's the rich who generally have capital gains in the first place, and not the poor.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (4)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Amen Fox.

    General economic indicators (GDP, DOW, etc.)too often ignore the distribution of wealth, and the fact that it's been widening over the last few years is concerning, especially now that Congress is actually considering worsening it by lowering the capital gains tax. Lowering the tax also wouldn't help our current budget deficits.

    Matt

  • 2

    Hey there, Mr. Fox. Rich people gotta eat, too. Never mind that po' folk like me have to decide between purchasing fruits or vegetables, not both. They're expensive!

  • 3

    People seem to spend so much time trying to find ways to increase taxes on the wealthy to equal that of average citizen.

    Why don't these people spend more time trying to find ways to lower the taxes of the average citizen to equal that of the wealthy citizen? Or why don't we eliminate the IRS altogether, and simply tax what we consume creating a fair and playing field for everyone, whether you are rich or are poor?

    Increasing taxes on the rich does not put this money in the bank accounts of the average citizen. It puts it in the hands of the government, and this does not necessarily translate into reducing the gap between the rich and the poor.

    Most of this debate is used as propaganda by political parties to further their agendas and get the votes needed to win elections. Nothing else. If people really wanted a fair system the IRS would be eliminated and replaced with an equal consumption tax. But that change is never likely to happen because the IRS is too easy for politicians to manipulate to get votes to win their elections, and this goes for both Republicans and Democrats.

  • 4

    If you want to be even more subversive, ask yourself why we SHOULDN'T double tax corporate income. After all, corporations confer enormous benefits (such as limited liability, the ability to raise capital in capital markets, unlimited life, etc.) so the taxation of corporate income could be thought of as simply a cost of having this type of economic structure.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed