New column: ExxonMobil likes paying its shareholders more than drilling for oil
My latest column is in the issue of Time with an ice-cream sundae on the cover and online here. It begins:
In January 1981, as gasoline prices set all-time highs in the wake of the Iran-Iraq war, oil giant Exxon announced that it would pour $11 billion into capital investment and exploration over the course of the year. That was a 35% increase over 1980 and a tripling of the budget from 1973, the year when the Arab oil embargo first sent prices skyrocketing. "The $11 billion is almost three times the profit we made in 1979," a company vice president told a reporter.
You probably know what happened next: conservation and a global recession--and the gusher of new oil produced by all that capital spending by Exxon and its brethren--sent prices plummeting.
Today, though, prices at the pump in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, are approaching those record 1981 levels for the first time. The company now called ExxonMobil turned a profit of $39.5 billion last year (on sales of $365.4 billion), more than any other corporation ever. Yet it isn't making nearly the investment in finding new oil that it did in 1981. Read more.
The column was based mainly on hours and hours spent trolling through ExxonMobil's financial statements. Consider it an homage to Allan Sloan, that great peruser of documents who is leaving Newsweek for Fortune. But don't blame him if you think it's all wet.
-
1
Exxon-Mobil is not holding back on investment in oil production because they want to cause oil prices to stay high, it's because they can't figure out what would be a good investment. Aren't they putting a lot of money into Canadian oil sands right now? That's the safest place to put their money.
Get real, people. Oil prices are going to stay high. It's a sellers' market. And synthetic transportation fuels are not going to be any cheaper.
I see they are talking once again in congress about making high quality diesel from coal. I'm the Bechtel expert on that, you know. Maybe I'll get some consulting jobs again! At $60/barrel, you can make a case for it but the investment costs are high and there are many tons of byproduct CO2 to dispose of. Better to make it from natural gas, as they are doing in Qatar.
Most Popular »
- Tennessee Mayor Accuses Barack Obama Of Hating On Charlie Brown, Peanuts
- Wii Fit Plus Review
- NV Sen Poll: Reid In Trouble
- Obama Shifts Date of Copenhagen Visit
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- 'Forgotten Man' II: Two-Thirds of Jobless Blue-Collar
- 135 Money-Saving Resources and Tips, Special Holiday Season Edition
- Twitter App Showdown: Echofon Pro vs Tweetie 2
- False Economy: Think You're Saving Money? Think Again
- Loving The Joke
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Will Federal Spending Mistrust Mean the End of Obama's Audacity
- Amanda Knox, Convicted of Murder in Italy
- Amanda Knox Testifies: The Murder Trial That Has Gripped Italy
- Nicolas Sarkozy: A French Paradox
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Astronomers Spot Planet-Like Object GJ 758 B in Orbit
- Foxy Knoxy Case Still Roils Italy
- Hate Your Job? Here's How to Reshape It
- Are TV Chefs Taking on the Latest Diet Craze?













RSS