Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

New column: ExxonMobil likes paying its shareholders more than drilling for oil

My latest column is in the issue of Time with an ice-cream sundae on the cover and online here. It begins:

In January 1981, as gasoline prices set all-time highs in the wake of the Iran-Iraq war, oil giant Exxon announced that it would pour $11 billion into capital investment and exploration over the course of the year. That was a 35% increase over 1980 and a tripling of the budget from 1973, the year when the Arab oil embargo first sent prices skyrocketing. "The $11 billion is almost three times the profit we made in 1979," a company vice president told a reporter.

You probably know what happened next: conservation and a global recession--and the gusher of new oil produced by all that capital spending by Exxon and its brethren--sent prices plummeting.

Today, though, prices at the pump in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, are approaching those record 1981 levels for the first time. The company now called ExxonMobil turned a profit of $39.5 billion last year (on sales of $365.4 billion), more than any other corporation ever. Yet it isn't making nearly the investment in finding new oil that it did in 1981. Read more.

The column was based mainly on hours and hours spent trolling through ExxonMobil's financial statements. Consider it an homage to Allan Sloan, that great peruser of documents who is leaving Newsweek for Fortune. But don't blame him if you think it's all wet.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (1)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Exxon-Mobil is not holding back on investment in oil production because they want to cause oil prices to stay high, it's because they can't figure out what would be a good investment. Aren't they putting a lot of money into Canadian oil sands right now? That's the safest place to put their money.

    Get real, people. Oil prices are going to stay high. It's a sellers' market. And synthetic transportation fuels are not going to be any cheaper.

    I see they are talking once again in congress about making high quality diesel from coal. I'm the Bechtel expert on that, you know. Maybe I'll get some consulting jobs again! At $60/barrel, you can make a case for it but the investment costs are high and there are many tons of byproduct CO2 to dispose of. Better to make it from natural gas, as they are doing in Qatar.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed