Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

Backdating: Not a victimless crime

A reader who knows more about accounting than you do had this to say about my intimation Tuesday that stock-option backdating was a nearly victimless crime:

Nobody got hurt? I'm not so sure. If these companies had been accounting for the compensation they were paying these guys, earnings would have looked a lot different. I can't believe that decisions would NOT have been affected. Maybe some people would have been scared off by the big paydays, and not bought companies that turned out doggy. Maybe some would have waded in anyway and gotten rewarded. I don't know. But I do know that the allocation of capital wasn't based on all the information in earnings at the time, and maybe some tech bubble madness wouldn't have occurred.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (1)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Under a provision of the Internal Revenue Code added in 2004, Section 409A, backdating options may amount to tax fraud on the part of the issuing Company and the executive who holds/exercises the options. Look it up.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Curious Capitalist Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
LORI HAAS, whose daughter was wounded in the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings, on a new report finding that officials warned their families more than an hour and a half before the rest of the campus and released locked-down students who were later killed