Backdating: Not a victimless crime
A reader who knows more about accounting than you do had this to say about my intimation Tuesday that stock-option backdating was a nearly victimless crime:
Nobody got hurt? I'm not so sure. If these companies had been accounting for the compensation they were paying these guys, earnings would have looked a lot different. I can't believe that decisions would NOT have been affected. Maybe some people would have been scared off by the big paydays, and not bought companies that turned out doggy. Maybe some would have waded in anyway and gotten rewarded. I don't know. But I do know that the allocation of capital wasn't based on all the information in earnings at the time, and maybe some tech bubble madness wouldn't have occurred.
-
1
Under a provision of the Internal Revenue Code added in 2004, Section 409A, backdating options may amount to tax fraud on the part of the issuing Company and the executive who holds/exercises the options. Look it up.
Most Popular »
- The Crimes and Misdemeanors of Meghan McCain
- The Discovery Gunman: TV as the Enemy, and as the Weapon
- A Few Thoughts on the God-Awful State of Customer Service
- Is red-hot India too hot?
- Hits and Misses from Today's Apple Announcement
- 18 Android Apps To Get You Started
- Call of Duty: Black Ops Multiplayer Offers Theater Mode, Wagering and More
- The 10 Tiny Details that Made Star Wars Matter
- Health Reform is Good for Small Business Employees
- The Obama Speech
- Tony Blair in 'A Journey': On U.S. Leaders Bush, Clinton
- Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers, Study Finds
- Why Israelis Don't Care About Peace with Palestinians
- How Barack Obama Became Mr. Unpopular
- Study: Young, Single, Childless Women Earn More Than Men
- The Science of Ambition: How Genes, Family Affect Success
- Why France Is Deporting 700 Roma, or Gypsies, to Romania
- Arizona's Anti-Immigration Firebrands: Fueled by Out-of-Staters
- How Can a Democracy Solve Tough Problems?
- Cause of Death: Sloppy Doctors













RSS